• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Portlanders for Parking Reform

Better Parking Policy For The City of Roses

  • About
  • Get Involved
  • What’s a Shoupista?
  • Posts
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / Are Portlanders Environmentalists?

Are Portlanders Environmentalists?

January 4, 2016 By TonyJ 3 Comments

Drowning EarthPortland is one of the most liberal cities in the country, on paper.  Our neighbors are Democrats, Greens, Working Families Party members, anarchists, socialists, and the like.  We garden, subscribe to CSAs, ride bikes, and talk plenty of talk.

But what happens when you suggest that we’ve got to increase the number of car-free households in the city (and the country) if we want to slow the rate of CO2 emissions?

“Not everyone can ride a bike.”

“Cars aren’t going away any time soon.”

“I need to get my kids to 3 after school activities in 3 quadrants 3 times a week.”

Are our neighbors who say these things environmentalists or not?

Is their identity as nature lovers, liberals, as “Portlanders” enough to convince them that they need to change, or at least stop opposing environmentally focused reforms (like upzoning, no minimum parking, parking permits)?

Should we push people to either accept and support the post-Paris agreement reality, which was the reality all along, or to stop identifying as an environmentalist?

Should we worry about alienating supposed allies if, when push comes to shove, they won’t actually stand up for what they say?

What do you think?

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn

Related

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Richard says

    January 4, 2016 at 7:20 am

    It sounds like most liberal people want to ‘identify’ as progressive and environmentally responsible….as long as it doesn’t involve personal sacrifice. I hear the ‘but I recycle’ all the time. But the talk about adopting a vegan lifestyle, removing the lawn, going carfree (or even carlight) is out of peoples’ comfort zone.

    Reply
  2. Doug says

    January 13, 2016 at 7:51 am

    Or, what is the result when it is suggested that higher density along transit corridors and around neighborhood centers is a good thing, environmentally? “Of course we need the density, we just need to do it right”. It turns out “right” is with lots of restrictions, like it has to minimize shading of a neighbor’s yard, it should have underground parking, it should have Design Review so the neighborhood can influence the design, etc. All of these restrictions, of course, raise the cost of such buildings, and militate against the possibility that such a building will actually be built, or if it is, cause it to be really high-priced.

    Reply
  3. doreet says

    December 26, 2016 at 7:33 pm

    the fact that our governor and legislature are selling Elliot state park to private lumber co.,s to give China cheap lumber, tells you what Oregon govt. is REALLY DOING.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to DougCancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search

Subscribe to Our Blog

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email.

Upcoming Events

Nothing from May 10, 2025 to June 10, 2025.

Like Our Facebook Page

Like Our Facebook Page

Latest Tweet

My Tweets

Recent Posts

  • More housing and no required parking. It’s time to pass the Residential Infill Project!
  • Proposal would effectively eliminate minimum parking requirements in Portland
  • Better chances for affordable housing? Not if parking is required.
  • Changes coming to NW Portland Parking
  • You’ve got a rare opportunity to tell the IRS to tax parking fairly, seize it.

Copyright © 2025 · Portlanders for Parking Reform · Log in

 

Loading Comments...